Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for VIV VIVIENNE TAM, serial 77743369, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
VIV VIVIENNE TAMSerial 77743369 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Tam, Vivienne
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed May 22, 2009
The record shows that the mark “VIV VIVIENNE TAM” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Vivienne Tam, never filed a Statement of Use or an Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was on the Principal Register and covered clothing goods such as tops, shirts, pants, jeans, skirts, jumpsuits, sweaters, shorts, dresses, jackets, coats, sweatshirts, sweatpants, vests, headwear, hats, underwear, brassieres, hosiery, sleepwear, scarves, gloves, mittens, bathrobes, slippers, t‑shirts, tank‑tops, shawls, belts, blouses, loungewear, swimwear, headbands, and shoes. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the apparel and footwear categories. The record does not give control over every use of the wording; it only shows rights in the listed goods. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on September 22, 2014. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the specific apparel classes remain a potential area of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.