Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAMSUNG, serial 77754863, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAMSUNGSerial 77754863 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: SAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION
Class 001 -
Class 002 -
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 004 -
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 010 -
Class 012 -
Class 017 -
Class 018 -
Class 019 -
Class 020 -
Class 022 -
Class 023 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 039 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Class 045 - Legal & Personal Services
Filed Jun 08, 2009
The record shows that the mark “SAMSUNG” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Samsung C&T Corporation of Korea, did not file a Statement of Use or an extension after the Notice of Allowance. The abandoned registration covered a wide range of goods and services, from industrial chemicals and paints to cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, automotive parts, textiles, clothing, electronics, advertising services, and travel services. A similar name would raise the closest concern in any of those areas, especially where the goods or services overlap with the original listing. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “Samsung.” The prosecution history shows a series of extensions for an intent‑to‑use application that ultimately failed to be completed. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful risk of confusion in the broad categories listed, particularly in the electronics and consumer goods sectors.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.