Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for KATIE BROWN KEEPING IT SIMPLE...AT MEIJER, serial 77804709, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
KATIE BROWN KEEPING IT SIMPLE...AT MEIJERSerial 77804709 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Meijer, Inc.
Class 004 -
Class 008 -
Class 011 -
Class 018 -
Class 019 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 027 -
Class 028 -
Filed Aug 14, 2009
The record shows that the mark “KATIE BROWN KEEPING IT SIMPLE…AT MEIJER” is dead, having been abandoned by Meijer, Inc., a Michigan corporation, because the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance on July 20 2010. The mark was on the Principal Register and covered a wide range of goods, including candles, patio torches, cutlery, electric blankets, lamps, patio umbrellas, garden stones, furniture, kitchenware, and various household items. A similar name would raise the closest concern for use in any of those categories, especially items sold in retail or home‑goods settings. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only the specific goods listed. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the history, so the supplied record shows no visible enforcement activity. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on February 22 2011. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the broad goods list still suggests a potential concern if the new use overlaps those categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.