Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for HEAVENLY BLOOMERS, serial 77818641, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
HEAVENLY BLOOMERSSerial 77818641 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Stephanie McGuire
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Sep 02, 2009
The record shows that the mark “HEAVENLY BLOOMERS” was abandoned on July 9, 2010 because the applicant, Stephanie McGuire, failed to respond to an Office action. The mark was filed on September 2, 2009 under an intent‑to‑use basis and was listed on the Principal Register for class 025, covering infant and toddler one‑piece clothing, infant diaper covers, and one‑piece garments for infants and toddlers. Because the mark is no longer live, it does not grant the owner control over the wording in other contexts, but the abandoned filing still indicates that the owner once sought protection for that specific clothing line. No enforcement activity—such as oppositions, cancellations, or court actions—is visible in the supplied history. The closest record‑based concern for a new name would be in the same clothing category, especially infant and toddler apparel. If you’re thinking of a similar name for a different product line, the risk is lower, but the abandoned filing still shows that the owner had an interest in that wording for those goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.