Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for EMERALD CITIES, serial 77819939, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
EMERALD CITIESSerial 77819939 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Sheri Jean Roese
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Filed Sep 03, 2009
The record shows that “EMERALD CITIES” is an abandoned service mark – the USPTO listed it as dead on Oct 23 2017 after the applicant, Sheri Jean Roese, failed to file a required Statement of Use or an extension after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was limited to class 035 consulting services about environmentally friendly products such as solar‑reflective pavement and cool roofing, and to class 036 financial consulting and carbon‑offset financing related to green projects. A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if you were offering comparable sustainability consulting or financing services, because those are the exact areas the record covers. The filing does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “emerald” or “cities” in unrelated fields. The prosecution history contains no refusals, amendments, or supplemental‑register activity, and there are no listed oppositions or cancellations, so the supplied history shows no enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to operate in the same eco‑consulting or green‑finance space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.