Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PROPAL REPROGRAF EL PAPEL ECOLÓGICO, serial 77825484, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PROPAL REPROGRAF EL PAPEL ECOLÓGICOSerial 77825484 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: PRODUCTORA DE PAPELES S.A. PROPAL
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Sep 13, 2009
The record shows that the application for PROPAL REPROGRAF EL PAPEL ECOLÓGICO has been abandoned, so it is not a live or registered mark; the owner listed is PRODUCTORA DE PAPELES S.A. PROPAL, a corporation organized in Colombia. The only goods covered are “Printing paper” in International Class 016, which means the closest area of concern would be any other printing‑paper products that use a similar phrase. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “EL PAPEL ECOLÓGICO” in other categories or contexts. The prosecution history shows the application proceeded on an intent‑to‑use basis, received a Notice of Allowance in May 2010, but the applicant never filed a required Statement of Use and the USPTO issued an abandonment notice on June 10 2013, which is the latest meaningful status event. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market printing‑paper under a similar name, because the abandoned filing still signals a prior claim in that specific product area.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.