Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BRINGING COLOR TO PEOPLE'S LIVES, serial 77840079, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BRINGING COLOR TO PEOPLE'S LIVESSerial 77840079 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Akzo Nobel Coatings International B.V.
Class 002 -
Class 007 -
Class 008 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 017 -
Class 037 -
Class 040 -
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Oct 02, 2009
The record shows the mark BRINGING COLOR TO PEOPLE’S LIVES is dead – it was abandoned on May 9 2011 because the applicant never filed a Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and the history contains no later maintenance or renewal filings. The owner listed is Akzo Nobel Coatings International B.V., a Dutch corporation. The registration covered paint‑related goods and services: paints, varnishes, lacquers, colorants, wood stains, priming preparations, painting machines and accessories, hand tools for painting, paint applicators and brushes, adhesive masking tape, advisory and information services for building refurbishment and decorative painting, paint‑mixing services, and custom‑painting design. A similar name would raise the strongest record‑based concern in those paint‑and‑coating categories, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the wording in unrelated fields. Because the mark was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, the prosecution history simply reflects the standard refusal to grant registration after the applicant failed to show use. The supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name for paint or coating products or related services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.