Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ORSON SALICETTI, serial 77855173, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ORSON SALICETTISerial 77855173 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Orson Salicetti
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Oct 22, 2009
The record shows that the mark ORSON SALICETTI is dead – it was abandoned on May 16 2011 because the applicant never filed a required Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and no extension was requested. The owner listed is an individual named Orson Salicetti, and the filing was based on an intent‑to‑use basis. The only goods and services covered are in International Class 043 for “Bar and cocktail lounge services; cocktail lounge buffets; cocktail lounge services; cocktail lounges; cocktail parlor services; providing a web site featuring a searchable collection of alcoholic and non‑alcoholic cocktail recipes; providing an interactive web site in the field of recipes for alcoholic beverages and cocktail.” A similar name used for anything outside those hospitality‑and‑recipe services would be farther from the scope shown here, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words. The prosecution history shows the application moved through examination, received a Notice of Allowance, and then was abandoned for lack of use; no enforcement actions or oppositions appear in the file. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a bar, lounge, or cocktail‑recipe website under a comparable name, because the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO once linked the wording to those specific services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.