Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for NWK LOVES U, serial 77869249, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
NWK LOVES USerial 77869249 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Hanini, Samer
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Nov 10, 2009
The record shows that “NWK LOVES U” is a dead application that was abandoned after a petition to revive was denied, with the last status change recorded on Feb 16 2011; the owner listed is Samer Hanini, an individual. The filing was for a service mark in International Class 035 covering a broad range of advertising and business services, specifically the administration of consumer‑loyalty programs for restaurants and retail, various advertising and publicity services (including TV, radio, mail, hoarding rental, and agency work), and marketing strategies such as word‑of‑mouth, viral, buzz and experiential campaigns aimed at the food‑service sector. Because the goods and services are limited to advertising and related business activities, a similar name used in that same advertising context would present the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields (for example, food products or software) fall farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “NWK” or “LOVES U.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history reflects a final refusal followed by abandonment rather than a supplemental amendment. The latest meaningful event is the denial of the petition to revive on Feb 16 2011, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer advertising services under a similar name, because the existing record directly covers that market segment.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.