Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MAMA LUSHIN : PART CHICKEN SOUP , PART ATTITUDE, TOTALLY DELICIOUS!, serial 77895305, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MAMA LUSHIN : PART CHICKEN SOUP , PART ATTITUDE, TOTALLY DELICIOUS!Serial 77895305 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: ANKER, MARLA A.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Dec 17, 2009
The record shows that the application for “MAMA LUSHIN : PART CHICKEN SOUP , PART ATTITUDE, TOTALLY DELICIOUS!” was filed by Marla A. Anker as an intent‑to‑use filing on Dec 17 2009, but it was abandoned on Jul 1 2013 because no Statement of Use or timely extension was filed after the Notice of Allowance was issued; the USPTO lists the status as “dead” and the mark never entered the register. The only goods listed are in International Class 016 – a long list of paper‑based items such as adhesive note paper, announcement cards, blank paper labels, notebooks, business‑card paper and similar printed or cardboard products. A similar name would raise the closest concern for other paper‑goods or printed‑matter offerings, but the record does not give the owner control over uses outside that narrow scope. No supplemental‑register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply tracks extensions of time to file a Statement of Use before the final abandonment. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so there are no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to use the phrase for paper‑related products, but the risk is far lower for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.