Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PERCY JACKSON, serial 77918113, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PERCY JACKSONSerial 77918113 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Jan 22, 2010
The record shows that “PERCY JACKSON” is a dead application that was abandoned on August 8, 2011 because the owner never filed a required Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and it never entered registration; the applicant was Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, a Delaware corporation. The filing covered only Class 025 clothing – shirts, pants, shorts, underwear, boxer shorts, hats, caps, sweatshirts, sweaters, skirts, gloves, socks, shoes, boots, coats, jackets, swimwear, belts, scarves, pajamas, slippers, infant wear, hosiery and Halloween or masquerade costumes and masks sold with them. A similar name used for apparel would be the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields fall farther from the scope shown. The prosecution history shows the application proceeded to a Notice of Allowance but was never consummated, and the latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on August 8, 2011. No oppositions, cancellations or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for clothing‑related branding, but it does not control every possible use of the words.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.