Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LOVE AND SQUALOR, serial 77926060, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOVE AND SQUALORSerial 77926060 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Rapp, Maral
Class 014 -
Filed Feb 02, 2010
The record shows that the mark “LOVE AND SQUALOR” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Maral Rapp, failed to file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was filed on February 2, 2010 and was allowed on August 10, 2010, but the abandonment notice was mailed and the mark was formally abandoned on March 14, 2011. The goods listed are a broad range of jewelry and related accessories, including beads, body jewelry, bracelets, brooches, charms, costume jewelry, and jewelry boxes, among others. Because the mark covers such a wide array of jewelry items, a similar name used for jewelry or related accessories would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, especially outside the jewelry field. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name in the jewelry market, the abandoned status means the mark is no longer enforceable, but the extensive goods list suggests that a comparable name could still face a meaningful concern if used for similar jewelry items.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.