Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BEAUTY - IN, serial 78011665, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BEAUTY - INSerial 78011665 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Min, Peter Daekie
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed Jun 07, 2000
Registered Apr 30, 2002
The record shows that the mark “BEAUTY – IN” is no longer active; it was cancelled on February 7 2009 because the owner, Peter Daekie Min, failed to file a declaration under Section 8. The mark had been registered on the Principal Register on April 30 2002 for the single class 005, covering dietary supplements, with first use in March 2000. Because the goods are limited to dietary supplements, a similar name used for other products would be a farther concern, but the record still indicates that the wording is protected within that specific category. The prosecution history shows a normal examination path: the applicant filed an amendment, received a Notice of Allowance, and was allowed on the Principal Register before the cancellation. No oppositions, extensions, or court actions appear in the supplied history, so there is no visible enforcement activity. If you are thinking of using a similar name for dietary supplements, this history suggests a meaningful concern; for unrelated goods, the risk is lower but not eliminated.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.