Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for VAAVOOM, serial 78012931, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
VAAVOOMSerial 78012931 · Principal Register
Dead · Withdrawn
Owner: Citicorp
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jun 15, 2000
The record shows that VAAVOOM is a dead application that was abandoned on March 26 2001 after the applicant, Citicorp (a Delaware corporation), filed an express abandonment, and there is no active registration. The filing covered three classes: Class 009 for computer software that lets users perform personal banking, bill presentment, payment and financial‑account aggregation over a global network; Class 036 for financial services including personal banking, bill presentment, payment and account‑information aggregation delivered via a global network; and Class 042 for providing customized on‑line shopping and purchasing services over a global network. A similar name used in any of those digital‑banking, payment‑aggregation or on‑line shopping contexts would be the closest area of concern because the record’s goods and services focus on those functions. The record does not give Citicorp control over every use of the word VAAVOOM in unrelated fields. The latest meaningful event is the express abandonment on March 26 2001, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name that touches digital banking, payment aggregation or on‑line shopping services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.