Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SECUREKEY, serial 78032977, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SECUREKEYSerial 78032977 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Mark Guagliardo
Class 038 - Communication Services
Filed Oct 30, 2000
The record shows that the mark SECUREKEY is abandoned, with the last status dated July 29 2022 when the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, and the owner listed as Mark Guagliardo, an individual. The only goods covered are “telecommunications services, namely, securing sensitive communications transmitted across a global computer network” in International Class 038, so a similar name used for any kind of network‑security or data‑protection service would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “securekey” in unrelated fields, and because the application never reached registration it never entered the Supplemental Register. The most recent meaningful event is the abandonment notice on July 29 2022; no further maintenance or renewal dates are provided. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action in March 2001, approval for publication in August 2001, and then the final abandonment, but there are no entries indicating opposition, cancellation or court action. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to offer similar network‑security services under a comparable name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.