Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for TOUGH 'N' TUMBLE, serial 78036476, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
TOUGH 'N' TUMBLESerial 78036476 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: DAVIES, Victor Owen
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 008 -
Class 010 -
Class 012 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Filed Nov 24, 2000
Registered Jul 01, 2003
The record shows that TOUGH 'N' TUMBLE is a cancelled Principal Register registration (serial 78036476, registration 2731981) owned by Victor Owen Davies, with the cancellation entered on Feb 6 2010 because the required Section 8 declaration was not filed. The mark was originally approved for a very broad set of goods, including baby‑care items such as lotions, diapers, feeding bottles, car‑seat accessories and toys, as well as cosmetics, cleaning products, paper goods, clothing and various medical‑type supplies. Because the listed goods span many consumer‑product categories, a similar name used on any of those items would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those classes would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “TOUGH 'N' TUMBLE.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply moves from approval to registration and then to cancellation. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations by a third party or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use a comparable name on baby‑related or personal‑care products, since the cancelled registration still signals that the USPTO once linked the mark to those categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.