Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BLOOMERS CLOTH DIAPERS, COVERS, AND MORE...WWW.COTTONBLOOMERS.COM, serial 78056283, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BLOOMERS CLOTH DIAPERS, COVERS, AND MORE...WWW.COTTONBLOOMERS.COMSerial 78056283 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Fessler, Rachel J.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 040 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Apr 02, 2001
The record shows that the mark “BLOOMERS CLOTH DIAPERS, COVERS, AND MORE…WWW.COTTONBLOOMERS.COM” is dead, having been abandoned on July 31, 2002 because the owner, Rachel J. Fessler, did not fully respond to the Office action. The application was filed on April 2, 2001 and the abandonment is the most recent status event. The goods listed in the record are baby wipes (class 003) and infant cloth diapers (class 025), with additional inactive classes for online retail services, custom manufacturing of cloth wipes, and educational demonstrations. The closest concern for a new name would be in the same categories of baby wipes and cloth diapers. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, and there is no evidence of enforcement activity such as oppositions or cancellations. A person considering a similar name should be aware that the abandoned mark still appears in USPTO records for those specific goods, so using a very similar name in that space could raise a risk of confusion.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.