Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MOTHER, serial 78075310, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MOTHERSerial 78075310 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Davis, William Robert, Sr.
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Jul 23, 2001
The record shows that the mark “MOTHER” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is William Robert Davis, Sr., an individual. The mark was filed as a service mark for education and entertainment services, specifically the production of animated or live‑action television commercials, films, Internet movies, animated video games, animated computer games, and animated character design, with first use in commerce in January 2001. Because the mark is no longer active, it does not grant control over the word “MOTHER” in any context, but it does indicate that a similar name used for the same or closely related services could raise a concern. The prosecution history shows a series of examiner assignments and a non‑final action in November 2004, followed by abandonment in June 2005. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations are recorded. For someone looking to use a similar name in the same entertainment or animation services, the abandoned status suggests a lower risk, but the historical filing still signals that the owner once sought protection for that specific scope.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.