Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLORAL PAPEL HIGIENICO, serial 78084264, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLORAL PAPEL HIGIENICOSerial 78084264 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Fabrica de Papel San Francisco SA de CV
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Sep 17, 2001
The record shows that “FLORAL PAPEL HIGIENICO” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, with the abandonment dated August 25 2002, and no later activity appears. The owner listed is Fabrica de Papel San Francisco SA de CV, a Mexican corporation, and the filing was made on September 17 2001 under an intent‑to‑use basis. The only class covered is 016, Paper Goods & Printed Matter, specifically “Disposable Paper Goods, mainly toilet Paper, napkins, paper towels and facial tissue.” A similar name used for those kinds of paper products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown here. Because the application never issued a registration, the record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action mailed on December 10 2001, assignment to an examiner on November 23 2001, and the final abandonment in August 2002, with no enforcement actions noted. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market comparable disposable paper items under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.