Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GLAMMA JAMMAZ, serial 78110313, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GLAMMA JAMMAZSerial 78110313 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Bandai America Incorporated
Class 028 -
Filed Feb 21, 2002
The record shows that GLAMMA JAMMAZ is an abandoned application, filed by Bandai America Incorporated on Feb 21 2002 and marked dead after the owner failed to file a Statement of Use or an extension by the May 27 2003 deadline; the latest meaningful event is the abandonment entry on Aug 18 2003. The only goods listed are in International Class 028 and include accessories for doll clothing such as cases, toy hangars, wardrobes, furniture, action figures, bubble‑making wand sets, doll accessories, doll cases, doll clothing, doll furniture, doll house furnishings, dolls, kites, musical toys, paper dolls, play sets for dolls, talking toys, toy bakeware, toy banks, toy tops, toy vehicles and toy watches. A similar name used for any of those toy‑related items would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that narrow toy‑accessory scope are farther from the listed coverage. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “GLAMMA” or “JAMMAZ.” No opposition, cancellation or court activity appears in the history, so the supplied file shows no visible enforcement signals. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a brand in the toy‑accessory market, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated product categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.