Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for GLAMMA JAMMAZ, serial 78110314, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
GLAMMA JAMMAZSerial 78110314 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Bandai America Incorporated
Class 030 - Staple Foods
Filed Feb 21, 2002
The record shows that GLAMMA JAMMAZ is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it “dead” after the owner, Bandai America Incorporated, failed to file a required Statement of Use or an extension after the Notice of Allowance was issued, with the abandonment entered on June 4 2003. The filing covered only Class 030 “Staple Foods,” specifically bakery goods, breakfast cereals, bubble gum, cakes, candy bars, candy‑coated popcorn, candy decorations for cakes, candy mints, candy, chewing gum, chocolate, cookies, ice cream and processed popcorn. Because the protection was limited to those food items, a similar name used for unrelated products such as toys, apparel or software would be farther from the scope shown here, though the record does not prevent any other party from using the wording in different markets. The prosecution history shows the application moved through normal examination, received a Notice of Allowance on December 3 2002, and then was abandoned for lack of use. No opposition, cancellation or court action appears in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a food‑related brand that overlaps these categories, but the risk drops sharply for dissimilar goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.