Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for TREASURES IN EARTHEN VESSELS, serial 78157067, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
TREASURES IN EARTHEN VESSELSSerial 78157067 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Secrest, Randall E.
Class 019 -
Filed Aug 22, 2002
The record shows the application for “TREASURES IN EARTHEN VESSELS” is dead – it was abandoned on May 06 2004 after the applicant failed to respond to a final refusal, and the owner listed is Randall E. Secrest, an individual from Maryland. The filing covered a very specific product: a reinforced cast‑concrete burial vault with detailed dimensions, triangular openings for human ash urns, bronze nameplates, rosettes and tamper‑resistant TORX screws, all described under class 019. Because the goods are limited to this type of concrete burial vault, a similar name used for anything else – say, pottery, jewelry or software – would be far removed from the scope shown here, though the wording itself is not blocked for all uses. The mark was never placed on the Supplemental Register; the prosecution history simply moves from a non‑final action to a final refusal and then to abandonment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on May 06 2004, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a modest concern only if you plan to market a burial‑vault product under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.