Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MASTER CHEF YAN PRESENTS SENSASIAN, serial 78168282, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MASTER CHEF YAN PRESENTS SENSASIANSerial 78168282 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Yan Can Cook, Inc.
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Sep 26, 2002
The record shows that the mark “MASTER CHEF YAN PRESENTS SENSASIAN” is dead and was abandoned by Yan Can Cook, Inc., a California corporation, after the applicant failed to file a Statement of Use or an Extension Request following the Notice of Allowance. The mark was filed on September 26, 2002, published for opposition on August 26, 2003, and allowed on November 18, 2003, but the abandonment notice was mailed on October 4, 2005 and the mark was officially abandoned on September 27, 2005. The goods and services listed are restaurants, bar services, and catering services under class 043. Because the mark was never registered, it does not grant control over the wording in other contexts, but a similar name used in the restaurant or catering industry would raise the closest record‑based concern. The supplied history shows no enforcement actions, and the last significant event was the abandonment in 2005. For someone considering a similar name, the record suggests a meaningful concern if the name is used in the same restaurant or catering services, but there is no active registration to enforce.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.