Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BACK TO EARTH, serial 78226000, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BACK TO EARTHSerial 78226000 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Bruno Hasler and Thomas Hasler Partnership, The
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Filed Mar 15, 2003
The record shows that “BACK TO EARTH” is not a live filing – the application was abandoned and a petition to revive was denied, so the mark is dead and never entered the register; the owner listed is Bruno Hasler and Thomas Hasler Partnership, The, a Swiss partnership. The only goods covered are musical sound recordings on compact disc, tape‑cassettes, mini‑disc, digital audio tape, digital compact cassettes and video tapes, so a similar name used for music recordings would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields fall farther from the scope shown. Because the filing never reached registration, the record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “Back to Earth.” The prosecution history shows the application moved through examination, received a Notice of Allowance, but then was abandoned for lack of a use statement and the revival request was rejected, which is why the status remains dead. The latest meaningful event is the November 2 , 2005 denial of the petition to revive, and the supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation or court actions. I'd treat this as a modest concern if you plan to market music recordings under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.