Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for THE NAME TO BE REGISTERED IS BREAD & BUTTER, ON THE TOP OF THE NAME A LOAF OF BREAD APPEARS AND ON THE SIDE A CUP OF COFFEE, serial 78229763, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
THE NAME TO BE REGISTERED IS BREAD & BUTTER, ON THE TOP OF THE NAME A LOAF OF BREAD APPEARS AND ON THE SIDE A CUP OF COFFEESerial 78229763 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: BREAD & BUTTER LTD, CO
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Mar 25, 2003
The record shows that the application for “THE NAME TO BE REGISTERED IS BREAD & BUTTER, ON THE TOP OF THE NAME A LOAF OF BREAD APPEARS AND ON THE SIDE A CUP OF COFFEE” was filed by BREAD & BUTTER LTD, CO, a Florida corporation, on March 25 2003, but it was abandoned on May 27 2004 after the applicant failed to respond to an Office action, so the mark is not live or registered. The only goods listed are bakery‑related items—bread, pastries and muffins—under class 043 for restaurant and hotel services, so a similar name used for food‑service or baked‑goods offerings would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “bread” or “butter” in other industries. No supplemental‑register filing appears, and the latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice in May 2004; no further maintenance dates are provided. The prosecution history shows a non‑final action mailed in September 2003 and the subsequent abandonment, but there are no indications of oppositions, cancellations or court actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to use a comparable name for bakery or café services, because the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO once linked the wording to that specific line of business.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.