Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FARCO-PHARMA, serial 78364451, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FARCO-PHARMASerial 78364451 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Farco-Pharma GmbH Pharmazeutische Praeparate
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Filed Feb 08, 2004
Registered Jan 31, 2006
The record shows that FARCO‑PHARMA, owned by Farco‑Pharma GmbH Pharmazeutische Praeparate, was registered on the Principal Register for Class 005 covering “pharmaceutical preparations for use in the treatment of urological disorders and diseases; and sanitary preparations for disinfection of mucous membranes and for use as a local anesthetic for use in urology,” but the registration was cancelled on Oct 5 2012 because the owner failed to file a required Section 8 declaration, so the mark is now dead. The record’s concern is limited to those urology‑related pharmaceutical and sanitary products; a similar name used for unrelated goods would be farther from this scope, though the wording itself isn’t blocked everywhere. The prosecution history shows the normal examination steps leading to registration, but no supplemental‑register filing appears. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 lapse, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a name in the same therapeutic area, but the risk drops sharply for dissimilar product categories.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.