Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PAPEL GIFTWARE, serial 78399432, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PAPEL GIFTWARESerial 78399432 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Papel, Stanley
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 020 -
Class 028 -
Filed Apr 09, 2004
The record shows that “PAPEL GIFTWARE” is an abandoned Principal Register application owned by Stanley Papel, with the abandonment dated April 18 2007 after no Statement of Use was filed following the Notice of Allowance. The filing covered three classes: Class 016 for gift‑ware stationery such as appointment books, brag books, printed greeting cards and notepads; Class 020 for picture frames, plaques and figurines made largely of cold‑cast resin; and Class 028 for plush toys and board games. A similar name used on any of those types of products would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories are farther from the listed scope but not automatically free of risk. The prosecution history shows the application moved through normal examination, received a Notice of Allowance, and then was abandoned for lack of use; it never reached the Supplemental Register. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice on June 20 2007, and no oppositions or cancellations appear in the file. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan to market comparable gift‑ware or toys under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.