Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for INSIDEOUT MARKETING, serial 78433645, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
INSIDEOUT MARKETINGSerial 78433645 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Havrilla Group, Inc.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Jun 11, 2004
The record shows that INSIDEOUT MARKETING is an abandoned application; the USPTO marked it dead on March 8 2006 after the applicant, Havrilla Group, Inc., failed to respond to an office action, and no later filings appear. The filing covered business‑sales and marketing consulting services and advertising and design services, specifically creating logos, corporate and brand identity, media planning, public‑relations, sales incentives, website development and various advertising media. Because the goods and services are limited to advertising and business consulting, a later use of “InsideOut” in a similar marketing or branding context would be the closest area of concern, while uses in unrelated fields such as food, apparel or software would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “insideout” or “marketing.” No supplemental‑register activity is present, and the prosecution history simply reflects a final refusal followed by abandonment. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice dated March 8 2006, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a comparable name in the advertising or consulting space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.