Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PULP, serial 78449213, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PULPSerial 78449213 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Pulp Health Pty Ltd
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Class 043 - Restaurant & Hotel Services
Filed Jul 12, 2004
The record shows the mark PULP is abandoned; the application filed by Pulp Health Pty Ltd on July 12 2004 was cancelled on September 13 2005 after the applicant failed to respond to a non‑final office action. The goods and services listed are limited to class 032 beverages—mineral, aerated and other non‑alcoholic drinks, fruit and vegetable juices, sports drinks, bottled water, soft‑drinks and even a blended fruit‑or‑vegetable sorbet mix—and class 043 restaurant and bar services such as serving food and drink, take‑away, cafeteria and juice‑bar operations. A similar name used for products or services outside those beverage and food‑service categories would be farther from the scope shown here, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “PULP.” The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on September 13 2005, and the prosecution history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so no enforcement activity is visible. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a beverage or food‑service brand that could be confused with the listed offerings.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.