Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PELOTON, serial 78452034, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PELOTONSerial 78452034 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: ACCELLENT INC.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 040 -
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jul 16, 2004
The record shows that the mark “PELOTON” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, ACCELLENT INC., did not file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was applied for as a service mark on July 16, 2004 and was published for opposition on November 15, 2005. The goods and services listed are business consulting services in supply chain management (class 035), contract manufacturing and product assembly services for medical devices and technology (class 040), and custom design and engineering services for medical devices and technology (class 042). A similar name would raise the closest concern in those specific fields, especially in medical device manufacturing and consulting. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the word “PELOTON.” The last significant event was the abandonment notice on April 10, 2008. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the specific goods and services listed still present a potential concern if used in those areas.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.