Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BUILDING VALUE, ENHANCING LIVES, serial 78457687, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BUILDING VALUE, ENHANCING LIVESSerial 78457687 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: SEROLOGICALS CORPORATION
Class 001 -
Class 005 - Pharmaceuticals
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Jul 27, 2004
The record shows the mark BUILDING VALUE, ENHANCING LIVES is dead – it was abandoned on July 11 2006 because the applicant never filed a Statement of Use after the Notice of Allowance, and no extension was requested. The owner listed is SEROLOGICALS CORPORATION, a Georgia corporation. The registration covered a narrow set of scientific and medical items: class 001 reagents and kits for research, class 005 blood‑plasma products and diagnostic controls, class 009 laboratory tissue arrayers, and class 042 services such as antibody production, custom cell cultures and related pharmacological research. A similar name would raise the closest concern if used for comparable research reagents, diagnostic kits, lab equipment or biotech research services, but the record does not extend to unrelated goods or services. Because the mark was on the Principal Register and never moved to the Supplemental Register, there is no supplemental‑register sequence to note. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice mailed on September 12 2006, and the file contains no opposition, cancellation or court activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern for anyone planning a name in the same scientific‑research space.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.