Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for FLOWER POWER, serial 78504131, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
FLOWER POWERSerial 78504131 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Montgomery, Max Edward
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 011 -
Filed Oct 22, 2004
The record shows that the mark “FLOWER POWER” is dead and was abandoned because the owner, Max Edward Montgomery, did not file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance was issued. The mark was on the Principal Register and covered electrical apparatus such as power strips and outlets (class 009) and various electric and battery‑powered lighting devices (class 011). A similar name would raise the closest concern in the same categories of electrical and lighting products, especially those sold as power strips, outlets, or outdoor lighting units. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the words “flower” or “power” in unrelated contexts. No enforcement actions, oppositions, or cancellations appear in the supplied history, so the record shows no visible enforcement activity. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status means the mark is no longer protected, but the specific goods listed still represent the most relevant area of potential concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.