Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for JUST BECAUSE INVITATIONS, serial 78535540, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
JUST BECAUSE INVITATIONSSerial 78535540 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Just Because Invitations, LLC
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Dec 20, 2004
Registered Dec 13, 2005
The record shows the mark JUST BECAUSE INVITATIONS is cancelled and listed as “dead” after the registrant failed to file a required Section 8 declaration, with the last status change recorded on Oct 19 2012; the owner is Just Because Invitations, LLC, a New Jersey limited‑liability company. The registration covered only Class 016 – paper goods and printed matter such as personalized stationary, envelopes, notecards, greeting cards, printed invitations, place cards, business cards and picture cards. A similar name used for those types of products would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside that narrow category fall farther from the scope shown here and are not automatically covered. The history contains no oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 lapse, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name for personalized paper products, but the record does not extend to unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.