Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for AU NOM DE LA ROSE, serial 78536650, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
AU NOM DE LA ROSESerial 78536650 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Bohbot, Georges
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 031 -
Filed Dec 21, 2004
The record shows the mark AU NOM DE LA ROSE was filed by Georges Bohbot as an intent‑to‑use application on Dec 21 2004, but it was abandoned on Jul 18 2006 because no Statement of Use or extension was filed after the Notice of Allowance was issued; the status is dead and the application is not live or registered. The goods listed are “perfume and cosmetics” in class 003 and “natural flowers” in class 031, so a later use of a similar name in cosmetics, fragrance products, or actual flowers would be the closest area of concern, while uses in unrelated categories would be farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “AU NOM DE LA ROSE.” The prosecution history shows the application moved through examination, received a Notice of Allowance, and then was abandoned for lack of use; there is no later maintenance filing or renewal date, and the supplied history contains no opposition, cancellation, or court activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a brand in perfume, cosmetics, or floral products, because the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO once linked the phrase to those goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.