Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for INSIDEOUT, serial 78579428, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
INSIDEOUT
Serial 78579428 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled

Owner: HEARST MAGAZINES, INC.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Mar 03, 2005
Registered Feb 05, 2008

The record shows that the INSIDEOUT service mark, owned by Hearst Magazines, Inc., is cancelled – the registration was cancelled on September 7 2018 because the owner failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration, and the mark is now listed as “dead.” The only goods and services listed are in International Class 035: “promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements in magazines and in an electronic magazine accessed through a global computer network; promoting the goods and services of others by providing hypertext links to the web sites of others,” with a first use date of November 2003. A similar name used for advertising or promotional services would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “insideout.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history shows only routine filings and a final refusal that was later overcome before registration, without indicating any enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer advertising or promotional services under a similar name.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search