Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ELEANOR DUFFY, serial 78588390, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ELEANOR DUFFYSerial 78588390 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Eleanor Duffy, Inc.
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 018 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Filed Mar 16, 2005
The record shows that the “ELEANOR DUFFY” application is dead – it was abandoned on July 10 2008 because no Statement of Use or extension was filed after the Notice of Allowance was issued, and the owner listed is Eleanor Duffy, Inc., a New York corporation. The filing covered three classes: Class 009 for eyeglasses and sunglasses, Class 018 for umbrellas, handbags, tote bags, pet collars, pet garments and pet coats, and Class 025 for clothing items such as raincoats, scarves, gloves, hats, boots, bathing suits, skirts, blouses, sweaters, pants, shorts and footwear. A similar name used on any of those goods would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories are farther from the scope shown. The history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so the supplied file shows no enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a mark in the same product areas, because the abandoned filing still signals that the USPTO examined a similar name for those goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.