Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for HE-MAN, serial 78589217, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
HE-MANSerial 78589217 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: MATTEL, INC.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 018 -
Class 021 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 028 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Mar 17, 2005
The record shows that the mark “HE‑MAN” is dead and was abandoned by Mattel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, because no Statement of Use or Extension Request was filed after the Notice of Allowance in 2006. The abandoned mark covered a wide range of goods and services, including cosmetics, electrical and scientific apparatus, paper goods, apparel, toys and games, and entertainment services such as online games and film production. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the toy, game, and entertainment categories, where the mark was originally intended to be used. The record does not give Mattel control over every use of the wording; it only reflects the abandoned registration’s scope. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice in April 2009. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the extensive goods list still signals a potential concern in related toy and entertainment markets.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.