Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for THE NAME TO TRUST, serial 78596592, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
THE NAME TO TRUSTSerial 78596592 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: CBR SYSTEMS, INC.
Class 039 -
Class 044 - Medical & Beauty Services
Filed Mar 28, 2005
Registered Jun 27, 2006
The record shows a cancelled Principal Register service mark for “THE NAME TO TRUST,” owned by CBR SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation; the registration was cancelled on February 3 2017 because the owner failed to file an acceptable Section 8 declaration. The mark covered Class 039 transportation and storage of blood, blood components and stem cells, and Class 044 medical services involving collection, testing, processing and preservation of blood, blood components and stem cells, so a similar name used in those health‑related fields would present the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give CBR SYSTEMS control over every use of the wording in other industries or contexts. Because the mark was on the Principal Register, there is no Supplemental Register sequence to explain. The latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation in 2017, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations by others, or court actions, so no enforcement signals appear. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable name in blood‑related medical services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.