Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for SAVVY MISS, serial 78604773, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
SAVVY MISSSerial 78604773 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: SAVVY MISS, LLC
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Apr 08, 2005
Registered Oct 02, 2007
The record shows that “SAVVY MISS” is a cancelled Principal Register service mark owned by SAVVY MISS, LLC, a California limited liability company, and the registration was cancelled on May 9 2014 because the owner failed to file a required Section 8 declaration. The mark covered, in Class 035, providing career‑related information and volunteer‑project coordination via an on‑line website, and in Class 041, providing online magazine‑style publications about dating, career, health, education, volunteer projects and current events. A similar name used for any of those online information or publishing services would create the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those described are farther from the scope shown. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Savvy Miss.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply moves from allowance to registration and then to cancellation. The latest meaningful event is the Section 8 cancellation in 2014, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations by third parties, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a comparable online information or magazine service under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.