Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for LOVE FLOWERS, serial 78604950, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
LOVE FLOWERSSerial 78604950 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Flat Creek Mountain, Inc.
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Filed Apr 08, 2005
The record shows that “LOVE FLOWERS” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead after the owner, Flat Creek Mountain, Inc., failed to file a required Statement of Use following the Notice of Allowance, with the abandonment notice mailed on Dec 14 2009. The filing covered a very broad range of electronic catalog and retail services, including live and preserved flowers, plants, gifts, clothing, jewelry, cards, stationery, e‑cards, books, magazines, totes, purses, umbrellas, art, tea items, vases, toiletries, perfumes, soaps, candy, candles, music recordings, wall coverings, furniture, toys and related accessories. A similar name would raise the closest record‑based concern if used for any of those online selling or catalog services, because the mark’s scope is concentrated on that extensive list. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “love” or “flowers” outside those described services. No supplemental‑register activity appears, and the prosecution history simply tracks the series of extensions and the final abandonment. The supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to offer comparable e‑commerce services under a similar name.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.