Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for WHO'D RATHER LATHER? LET IT GO TO YOUR HEAD WITH AERO HEAD., serial 78608841, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
WHO'D RATHER LATHER? LET IT GO TO YOUR HEAD WITH AERO HEAD.Serial 78608841 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: COSPRO Development Corporation
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Filed Apr 14, 2005
Registered May 16, 2006
The record shows that the mark “WHO'D RATHER LATHER? LET IT GO TO YOUR HEAD WITH AERO HEAD.” is no longer live; it was cancelled under Section 8 because the registrant, COSPRO Development Corporation, failed to file a declaration. The mark was registered on the Principal Register in May 2006 for class 003, covering hair care products such as shampoos, conditioners, styling gels, pomades, sprays, and hair color, as well as bath and body items like skin soap, lotion, toner, and aerosol or non‑aerosol skin‑care sprays. A similar name would raise the closest concern in the hair‑care and skin‑care product space, especially if the new use involves shampoos, conditioners, or aerosol sprays. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only over the specified goods. The prosecution history shows a standard examination sequence with a publication for opposition and eventual registration, but no supplemental register activity. The latest status event is the cancellation on December 21, 2012. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the cancelled status reduces the risk, but the specific goods listed still present a meaningful concern if the new use overlaps those products.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.