Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PUT...IT...ON!, serial 78612173, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PUT...IT...ON!Serial 78612173 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Jordan, Brian O.
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 018 -
Class 026 -
Class 028 -
Filed Apr 19, 2005
The record shows that the mark “PUT…IT…ON!” is dead; it was abandoned because the owner, Brian O. Jordan, did not file a Statement of Use or Extension Request after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was filed on April 19, 2005 and the abandonment was finalized on April 25, 2007. The goods listed in the application cover cosmetics and cleaning items such as body lotions, perfumes, and deodorant soaps (class 003), a variety of bags including athletic and travel bags (class 018), ornamental novelty buttons and ribbons (class 026), and sporting goods such as sports balls (class 028). A similar name would raise the closest concern in those same categories, especially cosmetics and bag accessories. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, only over the specific goods listed. No enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the overlapping goods still present a meaningful concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.