Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for ELEANOR FINE DESIGN, serial 78617822, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
ELEANOR FINE DESIGNSerial 78617822 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Rahim, Eleanor
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Apr 27, 2005
Registered Nov 28, 2006
The record shows that “ELEANOR FINE DESIGN” is a cancelled registration – the Principal Register entry (Reg. 3176211) was voided on July 5 2013 because the owner, Eleanor Rahim, did not file a required Section 8 declaration, and the status is listed as “Dead · Cancelled.” The mark covered scientific and technology services in class 042, specifically graphic‑art and commercial‑art design services for home‑decor items such as rugs, bedding, bathroom accessories, kitchen textiles, wall coverings, ceramics, tabletop, giftware and paper products, with first use in March 2005. A similar name used for those kinds of design services would raise the closest record‑based concern, while uses in unrelated fields would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Eleanor,” “Fine,” or “Design.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history shows only the normal examination steps leading to registration in 2006 and the later Section 8 cancellation. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations beyond the Section 8 event, or other enforcement actions. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a comparable design‑service brand, because the cancelled registration still signals that the USPTO once linked the name to those specific goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.