Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MARMA LOVERS, serial 78643183, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MARMA LOVERSSerial 78643183 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: E.D. SMITH FOODS, LTD. / LES ALIMENTS E.D. SMITH LTEE
Class 029 - Meats & Processed Foods
Filed Jun 03, 2005
Registered May 30, 2006
The record shows that “MARMA LOVERS” is no longer active – the registration was cancelled on January 4 2013 because the owner, E.D. SMITH FOODS, LTD. (also listed as LES ALIMENTS E.D. SMITH LTEE), did not file a required Section 8 declaration, and the mark is listed as “dead · cancelled.” The registration covered only class 029, specifically “jams, jellies, marmalades and fruit spreads,” so a similar name used for those food products would raise the closest record‑based concern. The record does not give the owner control over the words “MARMA LOVERS” in other categories, such as clothing or services, because the filing was limited to that narrow goods description. The prosecution history shows the mark moved through normal examination, was published for opposition in March 2006, registered on May 30 2006, and then fell into cancellation for the missed Section 8 filing. No oppositions, cancellations beyond this, or court actions appear in the supplied history. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to market jams or similar spreads under a comparable name, but the risk is far lower for unrelated goods.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.