Status report

Get it in writing

The official USPTO status record for DEAR MISS DAISY, serial 78670001, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.

INSTANT DELIVERY

Trademark Status Report

$7.99

The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.

  • Current status with a plain-English verdict
  • Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
  • The mark as it appears on the federal record
  • Every prosecution event, filing to today
  • Source-cited with the exact retrieval date

Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.

Payments launch soon. Leave your email and we'll tell you when this report is available.

Searching stays free, no account, no caps.

Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
DEAR MISS DAISY
Serial 78670001 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused

Owner: Posh Poochy, Inc.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Jul 13, 2005

The record shows that “DEAR MISS DAISY” is an abandoned application – it was never turned into a live registration and the USPTO marked it dead after the owner failed to file a required Statement of Use, with the abandonment notice mailed on August 20 2008. The owner listed is Posh Poochy, Inc., a South Carolina corporation, and the only goods covered are a magazine and newspaper column that give information and advice about the behavior of pets and their owners, filed in class 016 (paper goods and printed matter). Because the filing is limited to that specific type of pet‑related publishing, a similar name used for, say, pet food, toys, or services outside printed media would be farther from the scope shown here, though the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words. The prosecution history shows the usual sequence of extensions for a Statement of Use that were ultimately not satisfied, leading to abandonment; there is no indication of any opposition, cancellation proceeding, or other enforcement activity in the file. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a pet‑related magazine or column under a similar name, but the risk drops sharply for unrelated goods or services.

Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.

The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.

Your name deserves a straight answer.

Search the federal register free. No account, no caps, no waiting around.

Run a free trademark search