Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for BERTIL PETTERSSON ENERGY BALANCE + & - WWW.PLUSMINUS.SE PLUS & MINUS, serial 78695463, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
BERTIL PETTERSSON ENERGY BALANCE + & - WWW.PLUSMINUS.SE PLUS & MINUSSerial 78695463 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Plus & Minus AB
Class 011 -
Class 031 -
Class 032 - Light Beverages
Filed Aug 18, 2005
The record shows that the mark “BERTIL PETTERSSON ENERGY BALANCE + & - WWW.PLUSMINUS.SE PLUS & MINUS” is dead, having been abandoned because the owner, Plus & Minus AB, failed to file a Statement of Use or an extension after the Notice of Allowance. The mark was filed on August 18, 2005 and was published for opposition on October 31, 2006, with a Notice of Allowance issued on January 23, 2007. The goods listed are apparatus for treating and cleaning air and water to modify radiation, electric, and energy fields (class 011), live animals and fresh produce (class 031), and light beverages such as beers and fruit drinks (class 032). A similar name would raise the closest concern in those specific product categories, especially the energy‑field apparatus. The record does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, and no enforcement actions appear in the supplied history. Because the mark is abandoned, the risk of conflict is lower, but a name that directly competes in those exact goods could still be problematic.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.