Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for MISS ASSERTIVE, serial 78767214, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
MISS ASSERTIVESerial 78767214 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Gay, Nigel
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 042 - Scientific & Technology Services
Filed Dec 06, 2005
The record shows that “MISS ASSERTIVE” is an abandoned application – the USPTO marked it dead on May 22 2008 after the applicant failed to file a required Statement of Use or an extension after the Notice of Allowance was issued, and the abandonment notice was mailed on August 8 2008. The owner listed is Nigel Gay, an individual, and the mark was pursued on the Principal Register. It covered printed informational cards, folders, training manuals, posters and office stationery related to software that organizes Internet websites (class 016) and information‑technology and computer‑software consultancy services (class 042). A similar name would raise the closest concern in those specific paper‑goods and tech‑consulting areas, but the record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words “Miss Assertive.” No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history shows only routine office‑action responses and extensions before the final abandonment. The supplied history contains no oppositions, cancellations or court actions, so no enforcement signal is visible. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan to use the same wording for comparable printed or tech‑consulting services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.