Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for REMEMBRANDT, serial 78804877, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
REMEMBRANDTSerial 78804877 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: McLean, Scott
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Feb 01, 2006
The record shows that REMEMBRANDT is an abandoned service‑mark application filed by Scott McLean on February 1, 2006, and the USPTO marked it dead on February 28, 2008 because no Statement of Use or extension was filed after the Notice of Allowance. The only goods listed are “entertainment services namely providing web pages used to create personalized websites featuring the digital images and/or video of others” in International Class 041, so a similar name used for that type of online entertainment service would be the closest area of concern. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the word “REMEMBRANDT” in other industries. There is no Supplemental Register entry; the prosecution history simply shows the usual examination steps, a notice of allowance, a single extension request, and then abandonment for lack of use. The latest meaningful event is the abandonment notice dated July 29, 2008, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a moderate concern if you plan a comparable web‑based entertainment service, but the risk is far lower for unrelated goods or services.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.