Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for PAPERBAX ...BECAUSE YOU SHOULD NEVER HAVE TO PUT A GOOD BOOK DOWN!, serial 78844789, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
PAPERBAX ...BECAUSE YOU SHOULD NEVER HAVE TO PUT A GOOD BOOK DOWN!Serial 78844789 · Principal Register
Dead · Refused
Owner: Burnett-Evans Holdings, Inc.
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Filed Mar 23, 2006
The record shows that the mark “PAPERBAX …BECAUSE YOU SHOULD NEVER HAVE TO PUT A GOOD BOOK DOWN!” is dead, having been abandoned because the applicant failed to respond to an Office action. The owner listed is Burnett‑Evans Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized in Canada, and the mark was filed on March 23, 2006 on the Principal Register under class 016 for paper goods and printed matter, specifically book holders. Because the mark is no longer active, it does not give the owner control over every use of the wording, but the closest area of concern would be other book‑holding or paper‑goods products that use a similar name. The prosecution history shows a typical sequence of a non‑final action and an abandonment notice, with no evidence of enforcement activity such as oppositions or cancellations. The last meaningful event was the abandonment notice on April 17, 2007. For someone considering a similar name, the abandoned status reduces the risk, but the specific goods listed still represent a potential point of concern.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.