Status report
Get it in writing
The official USPTO status record for THE NAME THE WORLD BUILDS ON, serial 78870034, as a dated PDF. One price, one document, delivered in about a minute.
INSTANT DELIVERY
Trademark Status Report
$7.99
The USPTO's own status record for this mark, on one dated page.
- Current status with a plain-English verdict
- Owner, classes, filing basis, and every key date
- The mark as it appears on the federal record
- Every prosecution event, filing to today
- Source-cited with the exact retrieval date
Built from the USPTO's TSDR record. Assignment chain of title and TTAB proceeding files sit in separate USPTO systems and are not included.
Preview
◆ TRADEMARKCHECKER.AITRADEMARK STATUS REPORT
THE NAME THE WORLD BUILDS ONSerial 78870034 · Principal Register
Dead · Cancelled
Owner: Wolseley plc
Class 001 -
Class 002 -
Class 003 - Cosmetics & Cleaning
Class 006 -
Class 007 -
Class 008 -
Class 009 - Electrical & Scientific Apparatus
Class 011 -
Class 012 -
Class 016 - Paper Goods & Printed Matter
Class 017 -
Class 019 -
Class 020 -
Class 021 -
Class 022 -
Class 024 -
Class 025 - Clothing
Class 027 -
Class 035 - Advertising & Business
Class 036 - Insurance & Financial
Class 037 -
Class 038 - Communication Services
Class 039 -
Class 040 -
Class 041 - Education & Entertainment
Filed Apr 26, 2006
Registered Sep 08, 2009
The record shows that “THE NAME THE WORLD BUILDS ON” is a cancelled Principal Register trademark owned by Wolseley plc; its registration was voided on April 15 2016 because the owner failed to file a required Section 8 declaration. The mark was issued for a very wide range of goods and services, from industrial chemicals, paints and metals to building‑material hardware, machinery, electrical apparatus, clothing, advertising, insurance, construction services, telecommunications and education‑entertainment offerings. Because the cancellation applies to all of those listed classes, a later user of the same wording in any of those areas would encounter the closest record‑based concern, while uses outside those categories would be farther from the scope shown here. The record does not give the owner control over every possible use of the words themselves. No Supplemental Register filing appears, and the prosecution history simply reflects the normal examination and amendment steps leading to registration before the later Section 8 lapse. The latest meaningful event is the 2016 cancellation, and the supplied history shows no oppositions, cancellations by third parties or other enforcement activity. I'd treat this as a meaningful concern if you plan a similar name in any of the listed industrial or service fields.
Full event history, owner details, and verdict inside.
The way I'd use it, honestly, is as the thing you attach when a bank, a marketplace, or a co-founder asks "are we clear on the name". It answers in one page.